Technology

From detecting a sound to explaining it

We design the sensor hardware, the microphone array, the on-device AI, and the data structure ourselves. We test in real installations, so performance holds up when conditions change.

At a glance

Four parts we build ourselves

Hardware, array design, on-device software, and the data record. Pick a part to read the details below.

Hardware

Edge AI sensor

Analyzes sound where it is installed.

A small unit with a built-in solar panel that runs the AI on the device.

See the details →
Array design

Microphone array

Spacing set for each site.

Wide, narrow, or mixed spacing, chosen by the sounds you need to detect and where.

See the details →
Software

Edge processing

About 95% less data, by calculation.

Only the analysis results and the audio from each event leave the sensor.

See the details →
Data

Context data

Sound, place, and decision in one record.

Each event is stored with its surroundings and the reviewer's decision.

See the details →
01 · Edge AI sensor

A small sensor that analyzes sound where it is installed

The sensor analyzes sound on the device, so it does not need to send every sound to a server. A solar panel is built into the unit, which reduces the power work needed at installation.

Real-time detection24-hour monitoring in place of manual measurement
LocationEstimates where a sound came from and its direction
AI classificationMotorcycles, horns, construction, and equipment faults
Edge computingAI runs on the device itself
Multimodal AICombines sound with video and other sensors
Big dataAnalyzes stored records by area and hour
Edge AI acoustic sensor
The edge AI acoustic sensor with its built-in solar panel.
02 · Microphone array

We set the microphone spacing for each site

Spacing set for each site.

We do not use one array design everywhere. We choose the spacing and signal processing based on which sounds you need to detect, and where.

  1. Wide spacing

    Better at judging the direction of distant and low sounds. Suits wide roads and open areas.

  2. Narrow spacing

    Picks up high-pitched and nearby sounds precisely. The smaller unit fits tight spots.

  3. Mixed spacing

    Combines wide and narrow spacing for sites where several kinds of sound occur together.

How we test a design in the field

  1. 01
    Collect field data
    We record noise at real sites, including Siheung.
  2. 02
    Design signal processing and AI together
    Array processing finds the location. An AI model classifies the sound.
  3. 03
    Verify performance with tests
    We check sound classification against the set test criteria.
Prototype that combines a microphone array and a camera
A prototype that combines a microphone array and a camera.
03 · Edge processing

Analyze on site, and send only what matters

About 95% less data, by calculation.

Sending all data to a server makes transmission and storage costs keep growing. Our sensors analyze on site and send only the results and the raw audio from the moment of an event.

The figure is calculated from 16 kHz, 16-bit mono raw audio. It assumes only 5% of the raw audio is sent, along with the analysis results. This is not a measured saving. Actual communication costs depend on your plan and operating conditions.

Data one sensor sends per day

Raw audio, sent nonstop2.76 GB
CUSMOS, selective sending147 MB

About 95% less

Calculated value, not a measured saving.

04 · Context data

Sound, place, and decision in one record

A decibel reading alone rarely explains why residents are upset. CUSMOS records where and when a sound happened and what was decided, so the next similar case has a precedent.

  1. 01

    Observation

    Sound type, level, location, and time

  2. 02

    Surroundings

    Nearby homes, schools, and roads

  3. 03

    Decision

    The reviewer's judgment and the follow-up action

  4. 04

    Indicators

    Regional noise impact and whether a policy worked

05 · Fixed stations vs CUSMOS

Fixed stations are few and manual

Noise is the largest category of environmental complaints in Korea, at 46.5% in 2024. Yet 1,766 of the 1,828 sites in Korea's national noise network are still measured by hand.

ItemTraditional fixed stationCUSMOS sensor
CostAbout KRW 10 million per automatic station (2022, Daejeon project)Compact unit that mounts on existing CCTV and vehicle-detection poles
CoverageOne automatic station per 500 m radiusPlaced wherever complaints happen, as many units as needed
MeasurementMostly manual. 96.6% of the national networkAutomatic, 24 hours a day, with no staff on site
What you learnSound levelSound type, sound level, and location

The figures in this section are from Korea: the national noise network count, the 2022 Daejeon project, and the 2024 complaint share.

Start with your site conditions. We will suggest a setup.

Book a demo